- ARTICLE: Cherith Baldry
- NOMINATED BY: Community Consensus
| Cast your vote with the Feature Article Voting Scheme Select the code from the list below that best describes your feelings on the nominated article. You have a single vote, but are free to enter comments and questions as you feel necessary. Voting will be open from 23 December 2013 until 30 December 2013. | ||
|---|---|---|
| PICTURE | VOTE CODE | DESCRIPTION |
|
{{voteyay}} ~~~~ | You feel this article deserves to be featured, but does not qualify for gold status. |
|
{{voteyayq}} ~~~~ | You feel this article deserved to be featured and qualifies for gold status. |
|
{{votenay}} ~~~~ | You do not feel this article deserves to be featured. |
|
{{question}} ~~~~ TEXT | You are posing a question on the topic. (This may be done in addition to voting, both before & after) (Please enter your question in place of the word 'TEXT') |
|
{{comment}} ~~~~ TEXT | You are making a comment on the topic. (This may be done in addition to voting, both before & after) (Please enter your comment in place of the word 'TEXT') |
|
{{dontvote}} ~~~~ | You are choosing to abstain from voting on this feature. |
To be honest, I don't feel as if this article qualifies for Gold at the moment. While Cherith would be good to feature, yes, and she is an author, the bio is slightly stubby (and needs to be reworded somewhat) to be deemed gold. Unless otherwise proven, I feel that it could be improved at least a bit before receiving gold. Stoneclaw 02:29,12/24/2013
To be honest, I think her history's fine - I don't see any problems with the wording. ouo Queen Beebs 02:31, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
I don't think it's ready for gold, either. tbh -Ducksauce 02:47, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
Conclusion[]
As the majority is in favor, this article will be the January '14 FA but not receive gold status. Stoneclaw 20:14,1/2/2014