Ducksplash (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Stoneclaw33 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Oakheart looks good. c: {{User:Ducksplash/Sig}} 00:33, January 24, 2014 (UTC) |
Oakheart looks good. c: {{User:Ducksplash/Sig}} 00:33, January 24, 2014 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | I agree with Oakheart too. {{User:Stoneclaw33/Sig2|23:30,1/24/2014}} |
Revision as of 23:30, 24 January 2014
| ||
---|---|---|
|
I know it's a little late, but no matter. Suggestions for February's FA? If we want to go with the romantic love theme, we can do Oakheart or if we want to have the post-marriage-romance/romance-is-for-suckers, Loudbelly would be great. Atelda insert vague subtext here 23:12, January 23, 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, I say Oakheart, to do with the lovey-dovey theme of February c: Queen Beebs 23:14, January 23, 2014 (UTC)
Oakheart looks good. c: -Ducksauce 00:33, January 24, 2014 (UTC)