- ARTICLE: Role Play:Firestream
- START DATE: 23 July 2008
- REASON FOR CONSIDERATION: Character is obviously supposed to belong to ItE, even though it doesn't explicitly state it. Character has been confirmed not to exist by a member and friend of mine, SharpstarofFireClan. Also, even if it did exist, it's so poorly written and formatted that it would still be up for deletion.
- PROCESSED BY Σulãlíã(T–C–G) 15:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
--slayiulãlíã(T–C–G) 15:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I believe it should be deleted. I seen the many changes to Into the Elements and they don't want any of their role playing cats listed. I also didn't even see it listed. I vote it should be deleted. --Shim 15:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Kitsufox Fox's Den 13:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC) When 'nothing else is known' about a character, there is nothing else to convince me the character article should stay.
Redflare 15:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Grocery 05:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
FireWolf787 05:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Why do we have Role Play characters in WWiki?
- Kitsufox Fox's Den 14:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Theoretically they should be getting used for significant characters from an RP, to increase the documentation an RPG can provide here without having a really long, overly full page. But there's been some confusion and very very poor characters have been created. The RP stuff is a huge part of the Warriors Phenomenon... Without RP I don't think the books would have gained the popularity they have. We have the RP Namespace to prevent confusion, though.
Thunderstar2008 I'd like to know who created "Firestream" before I vote nay. Also, who said that people could just start adding "nothing else is known about Firestream" to the articles? If I'd known you could, mine and Blackstar's jobs would be much easier...
- Kitsufox Fox's Den 03:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC) You've already cast a vote of Nay, though it's void because you didn't sign with a date. Also, check the page history to see who created it, if that really matters so much. If you change your vote, please strike it out and make a new vote, rather than changing your existing vote. Thank you. Kitsufox Fox's Den 03:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Results[]
With six yay votes, and one nay vote, the article has been deleted from the wiki.--<Σulãlíã(Salamandastron)> 13:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)