| If you're new to the project, you may want to read the FAQ and Guidelines for an introduction. | |||
| Template:Project talk | |||
| |||
| |||
|
|
Discussion Archives [1-50] [51-100] [101-117]
| ||
Talltail and Jake
So, I was working on the article for Bess, when I came across an interesting tidbit. Keep in mind, I never finished Tallstar's Revenge, so I didn't notice this at first. Jake travels with Tallstar (who is a cited loner due to leaving WindClan), to find Bess and her group, and proceeds to stay with Talltail and actually appears to have temporarily joined their group alongside Talltail. Now, since Talltail is a cited loner, would this also qualify Jake for a loner/rogue ranking, and Talltail for a rogue image? Jake also stays with them, and hunts and stuff as well.
I'm not sure, but since the visitors are explicitly called rogues, and Talltail and Jake stay with them, wouldn't that mean they'd get called rogues too? I only say this because on page 382, Talltail said that he (although lying) wanted to join them. Although Jake's still called a kittypet, I think he'd fit the qualifications for at least a mention as a loner. <shrugs> I'm not sure, so that's why I'm coming to PC, instead of acting on my own and adding it. —Jayce(17:48, 5/30/2014)
I'd think that Jake would still be a kittypet, since he's still called one, while Tallstar would get a rogue mention. Queen Beebs 19:44, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
I actually agree with Snow; I think Jake could be have been a loner for a bit. ❄Sorrel It's everything I dreamed 19:45, May 30, 2014 (UTC)
I think that if he's still called a kittypet, then he's still a kittypet. -Ducksauce 04:23, June 4, 2014 (UTC)
If he's not referred to as a rogue/loner, he shouldn't get a rogue/loner charart. Simple as that. Appledash the light of honor 17:22, June 4, 2014 (UTC)
Talltail joins the group of cats, and they're called rogues (multiple times). He leaves soon after, but he still joined them. =/ I wasn't talking about the charart (not everything is about art and I don't care about that), I was talking about his rank. —Jayce(20:52, 6/8/2014)
I was only talking about Jake, but if Talltail does join the group of cats and he is called a rogue then he deserves a rogue ranking. -Ducksauce 21:17, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
Does anyone else have anything to add? Are we agreed? -Ducksauce 21:33, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
Yup, I'd agree with this o3o Queen Beebs 21:41, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
Content Drive
Since Mudclaw (WC), apart from TUG and Starlight, has a filled out history, and most of the problems the article had before had been fixed, such as quotes and history, and since I'm close to nominating him at this point, I think we should have a new Content Drive - and I have a new idea, as well.
-Singular cat; For this one, I choose Sharpclaw (SC) - his history needs lots of expansion, and more quotes could be used. He's in a similar state Mudclaw was in before his article became CD.
-Multiple cats; Skye suggested this earlier, and they thought of SkyClan in general, since most of the cats' history needs work.
What do you all think? Queen Beebs 20:49, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
Hm, what about a cat that's already silver but needs loads of work. Sandstorm would be a prime example of this, she's extremely major but yet her history is pitifully short in most sections. I don't really like the idea of doing multiple cats, because honestly it would be a hassle to keep track of and project members would have to go through a total of 111 articles and expand them. With the project's current size, I think it would be an enormous task to undertake, especially with already approved ideas in other projects that need tons of work (such as Chapter Subpages, and soon the Events Pages). I think it would be an unneeded hassle at this point. But, to me, Sandstorm and Sharpclaw are the forerunners for the next Content Drive. -Ducksauce 23:26, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
iirc i don't think Skye meant all of them - just the ones that are on PC's front page ^^;; Queen Beebs 18:54, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
I did mean the ones listed on the front page, since they appear to be in the greatest need of work. Why only one character, when someone can easily get that done in a couple days if they're feeling up to it? I think perhaps having a couple as content drives would be a good idea. Perhaps Sharpclaw, Harveymoon, and Waspwhisker? There's one fairly major SkyClan cat, and two more minor ones. I never said to do all of them- that would be madness, even by my standards, but perhaps pick a couple and shift the focus. Or, maybe pick more than one cat, so... say, Sandstorm, Sharpclaw, and Owl Eyes? And you wouldn't have to go through all 111 articles. A fair bit of them are already fairly good (I've written quite a few of them myself), and you could pick out the top two or three that are in need of the most work. —Jayce(00:55, 8/22/2014)
I agree with Sharpclaw being one. I have SkyClan's Destiny, so I can help out with that part of it, which goes for any SC cat. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:59 AM, Fri Aug 22, 2014
Multiple articles are interesting, but I'm more peaked at the idea of having an article already silver being the content drive. There's already an incentive for Sharpclaw, Harveymoon, and Waspwhisker because they're still bronze. Yet, focusing on a character that needs work that is already silver gives a bit of incentive in completing the content drive. Atelda insert vague subtext here 04:31, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
Even with only three articles, I think it would be daunting to other users and still hard to do. -Ducksauce 18:07, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
Mudclaw (WC) ~ Silver Nomination
And now today is the day this guy strays away from being CD. All sections were expanded by me, and Skye helped do TUG since I don't own a copy of that. Comments? Queen Beebs 23:34, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
wonderful! cbv? -Ducksauce 19:42, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
Vote is up! Queen Beebs 12:06, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Switch Template for certain characters
Sup guys anyway I'm thinking that some of the characters from BS might need the templates that Mapleshade and Brackenfur use. Some of these characters have only been in TLH and BS so far such as Heronwing, and so they've had two different descriptons for two different books, and we use that template for those that are about even in being described with two different descriptons, don't we? What do you think? (Descriptions can be found here along with the changes that happened in BS) david 🌈 01:01, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
I'd say if they're described in the book with a different description then sure use that template, but if one of the authors only said their description once go with the book's description and the other as an alt. -Ducksauce 02:42, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Coriander - Silver Nomination
Because I'm a sucker for her name and her attitude is amazing. I can't add page numbers since I do not have my physical copy yet- only digital, which doesn't show those. I'll add those later, once I get my hardbound copy. —Jayce(14:52, 8/26/2014)
Hootpaw - Silver Nomination
All hail Hootpaw our lord and savior. Page numbers will come once I get my hardbound copy. He doesn't appear anymore outside of the patrol encounter, and his quote is all he has, speaking-wise. He's a sassy little furball. —Jayce(15:11, 8/26/2014)
Hollypaw (BS) - Silver Nomination
Okay I'm done now lol. I'm so glad she's named after one of my favorites. Everything's cited and stuff, although I'm slightly hesitant on the "cousins" part of the family list... if I'm missing some, please tell me. —Jayce(04:21, 8/27/2014)