Warriors Wiki

Welcome to the Warriors Wiki! Want to edit and see less ads? Consider creating an account! Registered users will be able to edit pages, will only see ads on the main page, and more.

READ MORE

Warriors Wiki
Register
Warriors Wiki
Line 92: Line 92:
   
 
Archiving. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|20:53, 9/12/2014}}
 
Archiving. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|20:53, 9/12/2014}}
  +
  +
== [[Shrewfoot]] (Star) ~ Withdrawn ==
  +
<nowiki>[[File:Shrewfoot.star.png]]</nowiki> So, heres Shrewfoot. I rushed on the shading; it looks insanely dark, so i will re-do it on the next upload. Comments?{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 21:39, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
The main part of the shading is pretty good- I'd say it just needs to be blurred a fair bit, and maybe lightened ever so slightly. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|21:42, 9/5/2014}}
  +
  +
Add nosepink unless that was intentional. {{User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig}} <small><span style="{{User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Time}}">10:16 PM, Fri Sep 5, 2014</span></small>
  +
  +
there is nosepink its just grey. {{User:.Trollsky/Sig}} 01:26, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
Looks good to me. Blur the shading and lighten it? Poor Shrewfoot, I liked her.--[[User:EosOfTheDawn|EosOfTheDawn]] ([[User talk:EosOfTheDawn|talk]]) 10:27, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
'''Re-uploaded.''' Redid the shading; i just added a red tint, since the black made it look dark. Also, blurred it some more. Better?--{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 23:44, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
I think the shading with the black was fine, imho. You could lower the opacity of the black shading... also, blur this shading a lot, please, and lower the opacity of it, as it looks a bit too hardedged. <small>why does ''everyone'' diss black shading nowadays???? .-.</small> {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|00:11, 9/7/2014}}
  +
  +
'''Re-uploaded.''' Uh, i never said i was dissing black shading..? But okay. Blurred shading even more. (I've basically overly blurred this about 20 times) Is that better?--{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 03:43, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
I said that, because a lot of people seem to be against shading with black..no matter the pelt color. And since her warrior ''was'' shaded with black, I think it's only fair to keep the same coloring, that way you don't get told to change the color. Idk, tint's not required to match, but the shade you've chosen appears to slightly throw off the color. The black didn't make it look too dark, and lowering the opacity probably would have fixed that... Also, define the lighter areas on the paws and tail, and blur the back shading (or whatever we're calling that idk anymore- I'm tired) {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|04:28, 9/7/2014}}
  +
  +
The shading is very dark, lighten it a tad? {{User:Pikachushinx/sig}} 11:35, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
'''Re-uploaded.''' Made shading black again, and lightened it.--{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 16:25, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
Define the light on the tail. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|15:53, 9/9/2014}}
  +
  +
Your light source is off. Either add shading on the <-- end of the haunches and add a shadow on the back for the head or switch the side of the shading on the head and add some to the chest. {{User:Raelic/Sig_1}}<span style="{{User:Raelic/Time}}">15:57 Tue Sep 9 2014</span>
  +
  +
I see nothing wrong with the light source. I've used this source on all of my Starclanners, and no one has complained before. Unless someone else agrees, i'd rather not change it. I will reupload later for the tail.--{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 12:10, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
And I think it's off too. Just because you used it on other images doesn't make it accurate. I get told that ''all the time''. Usually, if Breezey comments, it's something important, and she's not someone you easily disagree with when it comes to chararts- she's a former lead, and a ''very'' amazing artist. She knows what she's talking about, and she ''made'' these blanks, so she knows the sources possible for this better than anyone, and if she says it's off, it probably is. This "unless someone else agrees" thing has become ''far'' too common for the whole of PCA. {{User:SnowedLightning/Sig2|14:04, 9/10/2014}}
  +
  +
'''Re-uploaded.''' I just extended her back shading going up the side so the light source would be coming from -->. Also, defined light on the tail and blurred shading some more. Better?--{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 23:52, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
Blur the shading and lighten it up. It looks too dark for the pelt color. {{User:Hawkmask121/Sig}}<span style="{{User:Hawkmask121/Time}}">0:03 Fri Sep 12</span>
  +
  +
Withdrawing this to work on Tornear.--{{User:~Breezeheart~/Sig}} 19:32, September 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
  +
Archiving {{User:.Trollsky/Sig}} 00:33, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:33, 14 September 2014

Whitewing (Q) - Declined

[[File:Whitewing.queen.png]] Since I once again picked a queen image that wasn't relevant, I decided to go with Whitewing instead. Here are the changes: http://www.ezimba.com/work/140909C/ezimba13931812589000.png I'm worried she looks a bit gray. Thoughts? Jayie Unwritten words~ 15:40, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

I only reserved this like two days ago, and I have another few days to post it. Sorry, but I have to decline this. Jayce(15:43, 9/8/2014)

Oh shoot, I didn't realize. D: I should've looked first, I'm so sorry about that. Jayie Unwritten words~ 15:45, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Her eyes are a darker green in her warrior image so darken them up a bit.--crow!!!! 16:38, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Archiving. Jayce(16:56, 9/8/2014)

Pouncetail (SC) (W) - Withdrawn

[[File:Pouncetail (SC).warrior.png]] hi I made a thing. Jayce(20:09, 9/8/2014)

Would you mind adding a bit more shading near it's rear end and on the haunches right above the back feet for the light source? This looks awesome. -Rustle it takes a leap of faith15:53 Tue Sep 9 2014

Withdrawing for something else. Jayce(16:17, 9/9/2014)

Archiving. Jayce(20:18, 9/9/2014)

Dewpaw (A) ~ Withdrawn

[[File:Dewpaw.apprentice.png]] Mrrow this was fun. :3  Frosty ☾Supernatural 12:28, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Brighten the white and extend it all the way up the neck. That's what I did with the kit.. Jayce(14:56, 9/4/2014)

Define what you mean by "extend" because I made sure the white was on the neck exactly how it was done on the kit. But I could be a little off.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 21:34, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

The white should be extended all the way up the shoulders, exactly like what Sorrel did for Havenpaw. Jayce(21:47, 9/4/2014)

Re-uploaded. Brightened the white up a bit, and extended the white over the shoulder. Can't brighten the white up too much because of shading..sorry it's the only way I know how to shade apprentices. Hope it's what you were looking for..and any tips you can provide to help me, Cloudy, are always welcome if you think I'm currently sucking this up. xD  Frosty ☾Supernatural 22:28, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, perhaps try something like this? The white seems a tad bit overblurred, and if you have to redo it, take your time and follow what I linked. Jayce(22:37, 9/4/2014)

Re-uploaded. I ended up redoing the image. Took my time and followed what you linked. I must say I'm pleased with the results. Thanks, Cloudy. =3 EDIT: I also tried a different source so I hope it looks alright.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 23:16, September 4, 2014 (UTC)

I preferred the old light source, it matched up with the kit image. The paws look a little too grey, brighten them a bit? EosOfTheDawn (talk) 10:23, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Light sources don't need to match, Eos, btw. Define the shading. Sorrel It's everything I dreamed 13:07, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Defined the shading, but I think there is enough light on the paws already.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 13:58, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

blur/smudge the shading on the back? and try to brighten the paws just a liiiittle bit? — ferk my name is BLURRYFΛCE 17:30, 09/6/2014

Re-uploaded.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 19:05, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Comments or CBA?  Frosty ☾Supernatural 12:03, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Define the shading. I know it's there, but it fades out every now and again, and maybe extend the ear pink on --> ear a little more. Also, shrink the white on the tail tip by a couple pixels. I made it pretty small on the kit and that was intentional. Jayce(15:43, 9/9/2014)

Not if you ask for it, buddy. Comments, yes. Asking for CBA gets your image locked for 24 more hours. -Rustle it takes a leap of faith15:45 Tue Sep 9 2014

lol I know Rae. But it's not wrong to ask with a bit of hope. And I'll get to that stuff a bit later Cloudy. But may I ask, wouldn't the white on the tail extend as Dewpaw grew up? It happens, and I believe it has happened on some other images in similar situations.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 19:26, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Asking for comments is okay, but asking for a CBA is not. Also, no, when I tweaked the kit image, I had every intentions of keeping the white the same length, and I don't think it would extend that far down. It's meant to be small, kinda like Ravenpaw. Jayce(19:49, 9/9/2014)

Re-uploaded. Better? And sorry, my bad.. I didn't know that.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 21:54, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to say, but I'm withdrawing. I want to work on something else. Thanks for your time, and good luck to the next person who does this.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 20:58, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Archiving. Jayce(20:53, 9/12/2014)

Dawnpelt (Q) ~ Declined

[[File:Dawnpelt.queen.png]] I love cream-colored kitties c:  Frosty ☾Supernatural 21:08, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

The face shading looks a little flat; expand and define the light. Sorrel It's everything I dreamed 21:19, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 02:11, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

If you're using the light source I think you are, I believe there'd be a spot of light in the cheek shading - but then I'm basing shading a shading placement I got a few months back Sorrel It's everything I dreamed 15:34, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Um yeah I can see what you mean. I would rather not change it, but if someone really wants me to I will. I just try to make it look like it's there. But yeah I'm not objected to changing it to that, but I don't want if it is not necessary. Edit: and facial shading is a pain in the butt as it is lol Frosty ☾Supernatural 18:31, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Sorrel would be correct. That source does have a highlight/lighter area on the cheek. Jayce(19:02, 9/11/2014)

Sorry, but this has to be declined, as Dewpaw is still on the page. Wait until your image is archived x.x Queen Beebs 19:07, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Okay .-. I'm still gonna keep her reserved though.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 19:48, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Actually, you can't. If an image is declined or withdrawn, you have to wait 2 weeks before reclaiming it. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 7:51 PM, Thu Sep 11, 2014

If an image is declined due to the one month limit, then you have to wait. Regardless, once your image is declined, you lose that reservation and are not allowed to re-post it unless you re-reserve it. And your reservations are good for one week and one week only- no exceptions. Jayce(19:56, 9/11/2014)

Seems reasonable. I'll go re-reserve her.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 19:58, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Since Dewpaw has been archived think we can just put this section back up for approval rather than make a new one? Or do we need to archive this one regardless?  Frosty ☾Supernatural 02:00, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

I still see Dewpaw on the approval page, and not in the archives. =/ Honestly, when I said you lost your reservation, that means you're not allowed to re-reserve it instantly. You need to work on something else first, then reserve it. That just defeats the purpose of it being declined if you're instantly allowed to have it again. All you did was change the date, which isn't very fair at all. Someone else should be allowed to work on Dawnpelt if they wish before you are allowed to repost. It's clearly said on the top of the page that your image is yours until it is archived. Jayce(02:04, 9/12/2014)

Okay. .-.  Frosty ☾Supernatural 02:05, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Archiving. Jayce(20:53, 9/12/2014)

Shrewfoot (Star) ~ Withdrawn

[[File:Shrewfoot.star.png]] So, heres Shrewfoot. I rushed on the shading; it looks insanely dark, so i will re-do it on the next upload. Comments?~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 21:39, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

The main part of the shading is pretty good- I'd say it just needs to be blurred a fair bit, and maybe lightened ever so slightly. Jayce(21:42, 9/5/2014)

Add nosepink unless that was intentional. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 10:16 PM, Fri Sep 5, 2014

there is nosepink its just grey. david 🌈 01:26, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Looks good to me. Blur the shading and lighten it? Poor Shrewfoot, I liked her.--EosOfTheDawn (talk) 10:27, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Redid the shading; i just added a red tint, since the black made it look dark. Also, blurred it some more. Better?--~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 23:44, September 6, 2014 (UTC)

I think the shading with the black was fine, imho. You could lower the opacity of the black shading... also, blur this shading a lot, please, and lower the opacity of it, as it looks a bit too hardedged. why does everyone diss black shading nowadays???? .-. Jayce(00:11, 9/7/2014)

Re-uploaded. Uh, i never said i was dissing black shading..? But okay. Blurred shading even more. (I've basically overly blurred this about 20 times) Is that better?--~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 03:43, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

I said that, because a lot of people seem to be against shading with black..no matter the pelt color. And since her warrior was shaded with black, I think it's only fair to keep the same coloring, that way you don't get told to change the color. Idk, tint's not required to match, but the shade you've chosen appears to slightly throw off the color. The black didn't make it look too dark, and lowering the opacity probably would have fixed that... Also, define the lighter areas on the paws and tail, and blur the back shading (or whatever we're calling that idk anymore- I'm tired) Jayce(04:28, 9/7/2014)

The shading is very dark, lighten it a tad? Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 11:35, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Re-uploaded. Made shading black again, and lightened it.--~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 16:25, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Define the light on the tail. Jayce(15:53, 9/9/2014)

Your light source is off. Either add shading on the <-- end of the haunches and add a shadow on the back for the head or switch the side of the shading on the head and add some to the chest. -Rustle it takes a leap of faith15:57 Tue Sep 9 2014

I see nothing wrong with the light source. I've used this source on all of my Starclanners, and no one has complained before. Unless someone else agrees, i'd rather not change it. I will reupload later for the tail.--~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 12:10, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

And I think it's off too. Just because you used it on other images doesn't make it accurate. I get told that all the time. Usually, if Breezey comments, it's something important, and she's not someone you easily disagree with when it comes to chararts- she's a former lead, and a very amazing artist. She knows what she's talking about, and she made these blanks, so she knows the sources possible for this better than anyone, and if she says it's off, it probably is. This "unless someone else agrees" thing has become far too common for the whole of PCA. Jayce(14:04, 9/10/2014)

Re-uploaded. I just extended her back shading going up the side so the light source would be coming from -->. Also, defined light on the tail and blurred shading some more. Better?--~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 23:52, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Blur the shading and lighten it up. It looks too dark for the pelt color. ☽➸ Hawky Void Shadowshot0:03 Fri Sep 12

Withdrawing this to work on Tornear.--~☯ Breeze Five Nights at Freddys 19:32, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Archiving david 🌈 00:33, September 14, 2014 (UTC)