Talk: Charart/Tweak Nominations

This is the Project Character Art Tweak Nominations PageDiscussions should be routed to the discussion page, New Art should be routed to the approval page, and all Art Tweaks should be routed to the tweak page.
Template:Project talk
	Archives Approved Archives 1-38 [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] Declined Archives 1-10 [11] [12] [13] [14]

Before editing this page, make sure you are clear on the guidelines for editing it.

TWEAK/REDO NOMINATIONS ARE CURRENTLY: OPEN/CLOSED, BARRING THE NOMINATIONS ALREADY POSTED (see the list below for images to tweak or redo)

Nominations

If you wish to nominate an image, you link the image (like so - [[:File:image.png]]) underneath the appropriate subheading, and list the reason(s) you wish it to be redone/tweaked. Project members with the ranking of warrior or above can vote, and only five votes are necessary for the vote to pass or fail.

Tweaks

Bramblestar (Ki) ~ Tweak Nomination

Kit the base coat looks darker than the other images, and could be lightened. Queen Beebs 19:01, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

can I have this, if Duck doesn't want it? ❄Sorrel _{It's everything I dreamed} 19:16, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 7:58 PM, Tue Sep 2, 2014

They're all the same. I got the file from Duck, and I assume he gave it to everyone else that asked for it. Those images need to match the colors from his kit image, not the other way around. —Jayce(20:05, 9/2/2014)

Would anyone object if I decided to switch this to one for all of the other images except for the kit, with Skye's reasoning? Queen Beebs 20:17, September 2, 2014 (UTC)

Honestly, I think it would be easier to tweak this since it's only one image. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}20:43 Tue Sep 2

The leader image is fine and matches the colors directly. I have the file for the kit, which I got from Duck. —Jayce(21:45, 9/2/2014)

I'm agreeing with Hawky... But I'm not sure what to vote here since I'm kinda confused on exactly where you want to go with this. Tweak for the kit, or all others? — ferk ^{my name is BLURRYFΛCE} 22:36, 09/2/2014

where are we going with this? it's been sitting for five days — ferk ^{my name is BLURRYFΛCE} 15:02, 09/7/2014

i actually have no clue - apparently the leader matches the kit, yet the kit looks wayy darker...i think in the end the kit should be tweaked since it doesn't match the others ;; Queen Beebs 15:05, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

Agreeing with Beebs. It would be much more work to make all the other images match the kit; it would be easier to tweak just the kit.--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 16:05, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

However, the base coat on the others looks more neutral brown than dark brown - perhaps the entire set should be tweaked to be darker? Queen Beebs 16:10, September 7, 2014 (UTC)

The kit was the first image made, therefore the others should match it and like skye said, the leader matches. -Ducksauce 01:37, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Since the kit was made first, then i say go for it and make the others match it. The kit actually does look dark brown, unlike the others which are about 2 shades lighter.--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 01:45, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Atelda _{insert vague subtext here} 02:01, September 8, 2014 (UTC)

Its quite a bit darker and it would be much more efficient to tweak one image than the entire set, whether it was first or not. And his images are plenty dark. -Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}16:20 Thu Sep 11 2014

Boulderfur (A) - Tweak Nomination

File:Boulderfur.apprentice.png shading needs defining. I'll take this if the OA doesn't want it. — ferk ^{my name is BLURRYFΛCE} 21:32, 09/10/2014

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 9:41 PM, Wed Sep 10, 2014

The shading is light but in all honesty I don't think it needs defining. Its place well enough that the charart has plenty of depth. -Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}3:10 Thu Sep 11 2014

^ -Ducksauce 03:14, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

As per Breezey. —Jayce(03:48, 9/11/2014)

I think that the light needs defining in places, imho, especially the legs... ❄Sorrel _{It's everything I dreamed} 18:16, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 20:32, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Honestly, could use some defining. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}22:58 Thu Sep 11

I just nominated it, only to notice this. Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 16:12, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Featherwing ~ Tweak Nomination

File:Featherwing.warrior.png The shading is pretty flat, and could use some definition. I'd like this if it passes. This can also go for a redo as well (since that texture doesn't look very realistic, and makes her look more mottled, but that's just me....) Queen Beebs 16:12, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

I see nothing wrong with it. Paleh shading isn't super defined and it's supposed to be feather-y since that's her name. —Jayce(16:19, 9/14/2014)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 5:13 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

It looks fine.--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 17:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}0:47 Mon Sep 15

It doesn't need to be darker but how its blurred does make it look flat. -Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}15:50 Mon Sep 15 2014

Just saying, but the ONLY reason I'm saying yes is for the texture to be defined. The shading is //fine// Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 16:26, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Crookedstar (W) ~ Tweak Nomination

File:Crookedstar.warrior.png The stripes look a blurrier then on the other images. *Hides* Pls don't shoot me. I'd like to try this one if possible Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 17:39, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

—Jayce(17:47, 9/14/2014)

 ~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 17:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 6:28 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}0:49 Mon Sep 15

-Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}15:49 Mon Sep 15 2014

Brick 05:11, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

Tigerstar (A) ~ Tweak Nomination

File:Tigerstar.apprentice.png The pale parts look a bit dark, and he looks a bit darker in general than the other images. I'd like this if it passes, if the OA doesnt want it.--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 17:54, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 17:55, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 6:28 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}0:49 Mon Sep 15

Its just shading placement. -Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}15:49 Mon Sep 15 2014

—Jayce(19:19, 9/18/2014)

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Ivytail (Alt A) ~ Tweak Nomination

File:Ivytail (SC).apprentice.alt.png This looks more golden-brown/tawny than normal brown to me. I'd like this if it passes. Queen Beebs 18:13, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

 ~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 18:17, September 14, 2014 (UTC)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 6:28 PM, Sun Sep 14, 2014

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}0:49 Mon Sep 15

Looks brown to me. -Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}15:47 Mon Sep 15 2014

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Brindleface (Ki) ~ Tweak Nomination

The Kit looks a bit lighter than the other images, but I think that has to do with the shading, which could stand to be tweaked. I'd like to take this, if it goes through. Jayie ^{Unwritten words~} 20:20, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

Honestly it looks like it's just a highlight, so I'm not voting. If it goes through thouch, the shading is fine you could just darken the base coat a bit. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 8:25 PM, Mon Sep 15, 2014

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}20:27 Mon Sep 15

Nah, it looks good to me. —Jayce(15:43, 9/18/2014)

Beechfur (RC) ~ Tweak Nomination

A, W More for the apprentice then the warrior, but the warrior could use some work too. Shading is flat. Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 15:25, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I'll take both if no one else wants them. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:02 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

I'd like the warrior, if the OA doesnt want it? ^^' Unless Rocket wants both.--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 02:59, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

The warrior is mine, please. -Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

I think they're fine, imho. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}14:23 Sat Sep 20

meh i just want the app. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 3:12 PM, Sat Sep 20, 2014

Cherryfall (A) ~ Tweak Nomination

A This one's gonna be shot down, but flat shading. Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 15:32, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

It's fine, imo. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}21:17 Thu Sep 18

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:02 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

—Jayce(15:27, 9/20/2014)

Dawnflower (A) ~ Tweak Nomination

A Same as all the other apprentices I've nominated. Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 15:37, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I think its fine. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}21:17 Thu Sep 18

Could use a highlight, again I'll take this if no one wants it. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:02 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

Brick 16:11, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Frostfur (Lo) ~ Tweak Nomination

Lo Shading is flat, I'd like it if the OA doesn't mind. Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 15:44, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

She looks gray, and the shading itself is fine. Just add some highlights and you'll be all set. —Jayce(16:03, 9/18/2014)

She looks fine but I kinda agree with Cloudeh User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 3:37 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}20:41 Fri Sep 19

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Brick 16:11, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Heathertail (Alt. A) ~ Tweak Nomination

Alt. A Flat shading. Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 16:10, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

I think it's fin as it is, but that's just me. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}21:17 Thu Sep 18

Same comment as above. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:02 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

mine ~Scarletwind^{"Time to go home Flap."} 21:09, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Ivypool (Alt. Ki) ~ Tweak Nomination

Alt. Ki Flat shading + Neon earpink (OK that's enough nominating for today)Shinxy used Thunderbolt! 16:10, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}21:17 Thu Sep 18

If this gets approved, can I nab this one? (if Brindlekit doesn't get approved first, which I very much doubt it will) Jayie ^{Unwritten words~} 00:48, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:02 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

I'm still a member here, and I'd like to be asked if I want one of my images before it's assumed I don't want them. Iveh Yo! 00:07, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Oh man, I'm so sorry, I totally forgot to ask if the OA wanted it first. D: I'm really sorry about being rude like that. Would you like the image? Jayie ^{Unwritten words~} 01:10, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Mossfire ~ Tweak Noination

File:Mossfire.warrior.png would anyone be against just letting me blur her ginger a bit? the patches just seem a bit pixely. david ^🌈 02:42, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

It looks fine. I think this image is very well done, and this is one of my favorite images. Its looks fine without being blurred, imho.~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 02:58, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

—Jayce(03:11, 9/20/2014)

-Ducksauce 03:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}14:22 Sat Sep 20

-Rustle _{it takes a leap of faith}4:09 Sun Sep 21 2014

Sandstorm (Ki) ~ Tweak Nomination

Kit I am new so I'm not sure I should post here or I should put it to approved Tweaks straight away but I find the eyes are very dark compared to the other pictures. I think it should be lightened. Stealthfire star (talk) 00:42, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

It looks fine as it is. It doesn matter if the eye color doesnt match perfectly; its only a few pixels of color there, anyway. Its not majorly important.~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 03:56, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks for answering! Stealthfire star (talk) 05:53, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Please post in the appropreate section and wait until you're a warrior in the project before posting here. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 12:04 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

Umm, no? You can post tweaks at any rank, you just can't claim them. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}20:44 Fri Sep 19

that's not what I was told. User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 3:11 PM, Sat Sep 20, 2014

Any user is allowed to post tweak nominations- rank doesn't matter. Only warriors and up may vote or do said tweaks/redos. Regarldess, this image is fine, and eye color does not require a nomination. —Jayce(15:26, 9/20/2014)

Snowdrop (KP) - Tweak Nomination

File:Snowdrop.kittypet.png - Flat shading and could define the depth in the eyes. Mine ~Scarletwind^{"Time to go home Flap."} 01:28, September 22, 2014 (UTC)

Redos

Plumwillow (Alt KP) ~ Redo nomination

File:Plumwillow.kittypet.alt.png This was sadly done in the time where I hadn't discovered gimp. So, there's no layers to separate the shading; which I think needs redoing badly. A redo would just be easier. It just looks flat, to me, and the eyes need more depth as well. I can do shading a hell of a lot better now. As the OA, I'd like it. ❄Sorrel _{It's everything I dreamed} 15:59, September 18, 2014 (UTC)

It's kinda dark too. ☽➸ Hawky ^{Void Shadowshot}21:17 Thu Sep 18

The highlights could be toned down a bit, too.--~☯ Breeze ^{Five Nights at Freddys} 03:51, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

User:Notquiterocketwildbokan/Sig 3:36 PM, Fri Sep 19, 2014

See? An example of saying she can do better, and also giving legitimate reasons. —Jayce(15:37, 9/19/2014)

—.neha ^{it's that gloom boy season.} 20:46, September 19, 2014 (UTC)

Approved Tweaks

Once an image is under this heading, it may be reserved on the project main page and crossed out with a <s> and a </s>. The image may only be removed from this list when it is approved and archived.

All project leaders are to keep track of the number of images on this list, including those that are crossed out. Should the number rise above 50, nominations will close and remain closed until the number of images on the list is down to 40.

Redos

1. File:Fircone.rogue.png - needs to match new pattern